Data source | Author | Country | Climate risks considered | Methodological approach |
---|---|---|---|---|
Adaptation to extreme rainfall with open drainage system: An integrated hydrological cost-benefit analysis | Zhou, Q., Panduro, T.E., Thorsen, B.J. and Arnbjerg-Nielsen, K. | Denmark | Flooding |
Cost-benefit analysis of open urban drainage system in Aarhus |
Assessment of the potential of ecosystem-based approaches to climate change adaptation and mitigation in Europe | Naumann, S., Anzaldua, G., Gerdes, H., Frelih-Larsen, A., Davis, M., Berry, P., Burch, S., Sanders, M. | Sweden | Flooding |
Cost-benefit analysis in Augustenborg for a system to collect rainwater from rooftops and other impervious surfaces and channel it through canals, ditches, ponds and wetlands before finally draining into a traditional closed sub-surface storm water system (known as a “Sustainable Urban Drainage System” (SUDS)). |
Climate change uncertainty: building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure | Gersonius, B., Ashly, R., Pathirana, A. and Zevenbergen, C. | UK | Flooding |
Cost-effectiveness and Multi-criteria analyses for urban drainage system in Leeds |
Copenhagen Climate Adaptation Plan | City of Copenhagen | Denmark | Flooding |
A Cost benefit analysis was conducted to assess the costs and benefits of Sustainable Urban Drainage System plus backwater valves plus surface adaptation to protect from flood (the Benefit-Cost-Ratio is 2.20). |